|
注册号: Registration number: |
ChiCTR2600126671 |
|
最近更新日期: Date of Last Refreshed on: |
2026-06-13 11:07:43 |
|
注册时间: Date of Registration: |
2026-06-13 00:00:00 |
|
注册号状态: |
预注册 |
|
Registration Status: |
Prospective registration |
|
注册题目: |
慢传输型便秘腹腔镜结肠次全切除盲肠直肠顺蠕动吻合术直肠保留长度的疗效分析 |
|
Public title: |
Efficacy Analysis of Rectal Remnant Length in Laparoscopic Subtotal Colectomy with Isoperistaltic Cecorectal Anastomosis for Slow-Transit Constipation |
|
注册题目简写: |
|
|
English Acronym: |
|
|
研究课题的正式科学名称: |
慢传输型便秘腹腔镜结肠次全切除盲肠直肠顺蠕动吻合术直肠保留长度的疗效分析 |
|
Scientific title: |
Efficacy Analysis of Rectal Remnant Length in Laparoscopic Subtotal Colectomy with Isoperistaltic Cecorectal Anastomosis for Slow-Transit Constipation |
|
研究课题代号(代码): Study subject ID: |
|
|
在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号: The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register: |
|
申请注册联系人: |
程康文 |
研究负责人: |
程康文 |
|
Applicant: |
Cheng Kangwen |
Study leader: |
Cheng Kangwen |
|
申请注册联系人电话: Applicant telephone: |
+86 13867408470 |
研究负责人电话:
Study leader's |
+86 571 6784700 |
|
申请注册联系人传真 : Applicant Fax: |
研究负责人传真: Study leader's fax: |
||
|
申请注册联系人电子邮件: Applicant E-mail: |
chengkangwen0556@sina.com |
研究负责人电子邮件: Study leader's E-mail: |
chengkangwen0556@sian.com |
|
申请单位网址(自愿提供): Applicant website(voluntary supply): |
研究负责人网址(自愿提供): Study leader's website(voluntary supply): |
||
|
申请注册联系人通讯地址: |
中国浙江省杭州市上城区浣纱路261号 |
研究负责人通讯地址: |
中国浙江省杭州市上城区浣纱路261号 |
|
Applicant address: |
261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China |
Study leader's address: |
261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China |
|
申请注册联系人邮政编码: Applicant postcode: |
研究负责人邮政编码: Study leader's postcode: |
||
|
申请人所在单位: |
杭州市第一人民医院 |
||
|
Applicant's institution: |
Hangzhou First People's Hospital |
||
|
研究负责人所在单位: |
杭州市第一人民医院 |
||
|
Affiliation of the Leader: |
Affiliated hangzhou first people's hospital, zhejiang university school of medicine |
||
|
是否获伦理委员会批准: |
是 |
||
|
Approved by ethic committee: |
Yes |
||
|
伦理委员会批件文号: Approved No. of ethic committee: |
2026ZN266-1 |
伦理委员会批件附件: Approved file of Ethical Committee: |
查看附件View |
|
批准本研究的伦理委员会名称: |
杭州市第一人民医院伦理委员会 |
||
|
Name of the ethic committee: |
Ethics Committee of Hangzhou First People's Hospital |
||
|
伦理委员会批准日期: Date of approved by ethic committee: |
2026-05-25 00:00:00 | ||
|
伦理委员会联系人: |
陆蕴 |
||
|
Contact Name of the ethic committee: |
Lu Yun |
||
|
伦理委员会联系地址: |
中国浙江省杭州市上城区浣纱路261号 |
||
|
Contact Address of the ethic committee: |
261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人电话: Contact phone of the ethic committee: |
+86 571 56007507 |
伦理委员会联系人邮箱: Contact email of the ethic committee: |
1742208034@qq.com |
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位: |
杭州市第一人民医院 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor: |
Affiliated hangzhou first people's hospital, zhejiang university school of medicine |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位地址: |
中国浙江省杭州市上城区浣纱路261号 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor's address: |
261 Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者): Secondary sponsor: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
经费或物资来源: |
自筹 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source(s) of funding: |
Self-funded |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病: |
慢传输型便秘 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease: |
Slow transit constipation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病代码: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease code: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究类型: |
观察性研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study type: |
Observational study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究所处阶段: |
其它 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study phase: |
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究设计: |
队列研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study design: |
Cohort study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究目的: |
探究直肠保留长度对腹腔镜结肠次全切除术盲肠直肠顺蠕动吻合术治疗慢传输型便秘术后疗效的影响 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives of Study: |
To explore the effect of rectal retention length on postoperative efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with cecorectal isoperistaltic anastomosis in the treatment of slow transit constipation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
药物成份或治疗方案详述: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
纳入标准: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inclusion criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
排除标准: |
1.严重系统性疾病:严重冠心病、失代偿期心功能不全、严重糖尿病并发症、严重呼吸系统疾病或脑血管疾病等,无法耐受本次手术者; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusion criteria: |
1.Presence of severe systemic diseases that precluded surgical treatment, including severe coronary artery disease, decompensated heart failure, severe diabetic complications, advanced respiratory disease, cerebrovascular disease, or other conditions associated with an unacceptable operative risk; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施时间: Study execute time: |
从 From 2026-06-15 00:00:00至 To 2028-10-01 00:00:00 |
征募观察对象时间: Recruiting time: |
从 From 2026-06-15 00:00:00 至 To 2027-12-01 00:00:00 |
|
干预措施: Interventions: |
|
|
研究实施地点: Countries of recruitment and research settings: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
测量指标: Outcomes: |
|
|
采集人体标本:
Collecting sample(s)
|
|
|
征募研究对象情况: Recruiting status: |
尚未开始 Not yet recruiting |
年龄范围: Participant age: |
|
||||||
|
性别: |
男女均可 |
Gender: |
Both |
||||||
|
随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列): |
无 |
||||||||
|
Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method): |
None |
||||||||
|
是否公开试验完成后的统计结果: Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access: |
不公开/Private |
|
盲法: |
无 |
|
Blinding: |
None |
|
是否共享原始数据: IPD sharing |
否No |
|
共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址): |
本研究为前瞻性临床研究,暂不对外公开原始临床数据,无公开数据发布时间及网络共享平台。 |
|
The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url): |
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. No relevant web-based database and access URL are available. |
|
数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC: |
本研究为前瞻性观察性研究,根据术中直肠实际保留长度自然分组,按统一纳入排除标准纳入研究对象。分别于入院时、术中及术后各固定时间节点系统采集临床资料。统一设计标准化病例观察记录表,由经过统一培训的专职研究人员完成数据采集与信息录入,规避信息偏倚。采集内容包括:受试者一般基线资料(性别、年龄、身体质量指数、NRS 2002 评分、糖尿病及心脑血管疾病等合并症、ASA 分级);围手术期指标(直肠保留长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次排气时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症),于术前及术后 3、6、12 个月通过住院记录、电话 / 微信随访及门诊复查,统一评估 Wexner 便秘评分、GIQLI 胃肠生活质量评分、腹痛腹胀评分、Wexner 肛门失禁评分,并完善肛门直肠测压检测。所有观察指标均参照统一临床标准评定,评估时间点全程固定一致,保证两组数据采集流程同质化、标准化。 |
|
Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture: |
This was a prospective observational study in which patients were naturally allocated into groups according to the actual length of the retained rectal stump measured intraoperatively. All participants were enrolled based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical data were systematically collected at admission, during surgery, and at predetermined postoperative follow-up time points.A standardized case report form (CRF) was developed for the study, and all data collection and entry were performed by dedicated research personnel who had received uniform training, thereby minimizing information bias. The collected data included baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score, comorbidities (including diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases), and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification.Perioperative variables included rectal stump length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first postoperative flatus, postoperative length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.Follow-up assessments were conducted preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery through hospitalization records, telephone or WeChat interviews, and outpatient clinic visits. The Wexner Constipation Score, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score, abdominal pain and bloating scores, and Wexner Incontinence Score were uniformly evaluated at each follow-up time point. In addition, anorectal manometry was performed to assess anorectal function.All outcome measures were assessed according to standardized clinical criteria. The timing and procedures of data collection and evaluation were kept consistent throughout the study to ensure homogeneity and standardization between the two groups. |
|
数据与安全监察委员会: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: |
无/No |