|
注册号: Registration number: |
ChiCTR2600125972 |
|
最近更新日期: Date of Last Refreshed on: |
2026-06-01 22:05:43 |
|
注册时间: Date of Registration: |
2026-06-01 00:00:00 |
|
注册号状态: |
预注册 |
|
Registration Status: |
Prospective registration |
|
注册题目: |
内镜经筛眶减压联合I期斜视矫正手术治疗TAO伴水平斜视:一项多中心、随机、对照研究 |
|
Public title: |
Endoscopic Transethmoidal Orbital Decompression Combined with One-Stage Strabismus Correction Surgery for TAO with Horizontal Strabismus: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
|
注册题目简写: |
|
|
English Acronym: |
|
|
研究课题的正式科学名称: |
内镜经筛眶减压联合I期斜视矫正手术治疗TAO伴水平斜视:一项多中心、随机、对照研究 |
|
Scientific title: |
Endoscopic Transethmoidal Orbital Decompression Combined with One-Stage Strabismus Correction Surgery for TAO with Horizontal Strabismus: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
|
研究课题代号(代码): Study subject ID: |
|
|
在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号: The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register: |
|
申请注册联系人: |
涂云海 |
研究负责人: |
涂云海 |
|
Applicant: |
Yunhai TU |
Study leader: |
Yunhai Tu |
|
申请注册联系人电话: Applicant telephone: |
+86 577 8806 8861 |
研究负责人电话:
Study leader's |
+86 577 8806 8861 |
|
申请注册联系人传真 : Applicant Fax: |
研究负责人传真: Study leader's fax: |
||
|
申请注册联系人电子邮件: Applicant E-mail: |
tyh5@21cn.com |
研究负责人电子邮件: Study leader's E-mail: |
tyh5@21cn.com |
|
申请单位网址(自愿提供): Applicant website(voluntary supply): |
研究负责人网址(自愿提供): Study leader's website(voluntary supply): |
||
|
申请注册联系人通讯地址: |
浙江省温州市鹿城区学院西路270号 |
研究负责人通讯地址: |
浙江省温州市鹿城区学院西路270号 |
|
Applicant address: |
270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang,China |
Study leader's address: |
270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang,China |
|
申请注册联系人邮政编码: Applicant postcode: |
研究负责人邮政编码: Study leader's postcode: |
||
|
申请人所在单位: |
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院 |
||
|
Applicant's institution: |
Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University |
||
|
研究负责人所在单位: |
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院 |
||
|
Affiliation of the Leader: |
Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University |
||
|
是否获伦理委员会批准: |
是 |
||
|
Approved by ethic committee: |
Yes |
||
|
伦理委员会批件文号: Approved No. of ethic committee: |
温医大眼视光伦审2026研第089号 |
伦理委员会批件附件: Approved file of Ethical Committee: |
查看附件View |
|
批准本研究的伦理委员会名称: |
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院伦理委员会 |
||
|
Name of the ethic committee: |
Ethics committee of Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University |
||
|
伦理委员会批准日期: Date of approved by ethic committee: |
2026-04-20 00:00:00 | ||
|
伦理委员会联系人: |
谷佩秋 |
||
|
Contact Name of the ethic committee: |
Gu PeiQiu |
||
|
伦理委员会联系地址: |
浙江省温州市鹿城区学院西路270号 |
||
|
Contact Address of the ethic committee: |
270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang,China |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人电话: Contact phone of the ethic committee: |
+86 577 8807 5582 |
伦理委员会联系人邮箱: Contact email of the ethic committee: |
gupeiqiu@126.com |
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位: |
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor: |
Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位地址: |
浙江省温州市鹿城区学院西路270号 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor's address: |
270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang,China |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者): Secondary sponsor: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
经费或物资来源: |
自选课题(自筹) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source(s) of funding: |
Self-raised |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病: |
甲状腺相关性眼病;限制性斜视 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease: |
Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy;restrictive strabismus |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病代码: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease code: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究类型: |
干预性研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study type: |
Interventional study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究所处阶段: |
其它 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study phase: |
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究设计: |
随机平行对照 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study design: |
Parallel |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究目的: |
比较一期眶壁减压手术联合斜视矫正手术与传统的分阶段手术治疗甲状腺相关性眼病患者水平斜视的有效性和安全性。 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives of Study: |
Comparing of the efficacy and safety of one-stage orbital wall decompression surgery combined with strabismus correction surgery versus traditional staged surgery for the treatment of horizontal strabismus in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
药物成份或治疗方案详述: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
纳入标准: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inclusion criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
排除标准: |
1.斜视是由于其他病因所致; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusion criteria: |
1.The strabismus is caused by any other factor; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施时间: Study execute time: |
从 From 2026-04-01 00:00:00至 To 2027-10-31 00:00:00 |
征募观察对象时间: Recruiting time: |
从 From 2026-06-01 00:00:00 至 To 2027-03-31 00:00:00 |
|
干预措施: Interventions: |
|
|
研究实施地点: Countries of recruitment and research settings: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
测量指标: Outcomes: |
|
|
采集人体标本:
Collecting sample(s)
|
|
|
征募研究对象情况: Recruiting status: |
尚未开始 Not yet recruiting |
年龄范围: Participant age: |
|
||||||
|
性别: |
男女均可 |
Gender: |
Both |
||||||
|
随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列): |
随机序列由独立统计师使用SAS软件生成,采用区组长度为4或6的可变区组设计,确保每家中心内两组样本量均衡。 |
||||||||
|
Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method): |
Random sequences were generated by an independent statitidan using SAS soltware ith a variable block design featuring block lengths of4 or to ensure balanced sample sizesbetween the two groups within each center. |
||||||||
|
是否公开试验完成后的统计结果: Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access: |
不公开/Private |
|
盲法: |
开放标签,对评估者隐藏分组 |
|
Blinding: |
Open-label study with blinded-evaluators |
|
是否共享原始数据: IPD sharing |
否No |
|
共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址): |
本研究的原始数据将在研究结果发表后,为符合学术规范的外部研究者提供合理共享。外部人员需向研究团队提交书面数据使用申请(含研究目的、使用范围、数据保密承诺),经审核通过后,将提供脱敏后的原始数据(去除受试者隐私信息,保留可溯源的匿名化检测数掘、随访记录),数据以标准化格式(如SPSS、CSV文件)交付,共享范围不包含可识别个人身份的信息,使用方需遵守数据保密及合理使用协议。 |
|
The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url): |
The original data from this study will be made available for reasonable sharing with external researchers in accordance with academic standards after the publication of the study results. External parties must submit a written request for data use (including research purpose, scope of use, and a data confidentiality commitment) to the research team. After approval, de-identified raw data (with personally identifiable information removed, while retaining anonymized test data and follow-up records that remain traceable) will be provided in standardized formats (e.g., SPSS, CSV files). The shared data will not include any personally identifiable information, and the requesting party is required to comply with the data confidentiality and fair use agreement. |
|
数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC: |
1)数据记录工具 专门为本研究设计了病例报告表(CRF)进行记录,内容包括受试者的基本信息(包括性别、年龄、身高、体重)、既往史(吸烟史、高血压和糖尿病等全身性疾病病史、用药史、手术史、确诊甲状腺功能异常病史、确诊TAO病史)、临床检查结果(视力及验光结果、甲状腺功能检查、CAS评分、眼压、眼球突出度、视野、同视机、双眼视功能检查、眼位照相)、评分表(生活质量评估问卷)、影像学检查(眼眶CT检查)。所有参与研究人员均接受统一培训,确保对各指标的定义、测量方法和记录要求理解一致。 2)数据录入与核对 各中心指定专人负责数据录入工作。优先使用电子数据采集系统(EDC)进行数据录入,提高数据收集的效率和质量,并通过设置数据验证规则和逻辑检查,及时发现和纠正录入错误,保证数据的真实性和可靠性。暂无条件使用EDC者可采用纸质CRF记录,后续录入至牵头单位统一提供的电子数据模板,数据录入采用双人独立录入+交叉核对模式,即由两人分别录入同一份数据,完成后进行比对,发现不一致时及时溯源原始记录进行更正。无论采用何种录入方式,录入工作均应在每次随访完成后1周内完成。 3)数据核查与质控 各中心负责人对本科室数据的真实性和完整性负责。CRF提交前,应由指定人员对照原始病历完成关键指标的核对,确认无误后签字确认。 牵头单位定期组织数据质量抽查,原则上每3个月进行一次,每次抽查比例不低于各中心入组病例数的20%。抽查内容包括数据完整性、与原始记录的一致性及方案依从性。发现问题时,牵头单位出具书面反馈意见,相关中心应在2周内完成核实并反馈修正结果。 4)数据清洗与疑问处理 统计分析前,由统计人员对汇总数据库进行逻辑核查,重点筛查缺失值、异常值及逻辑矛盾(如手术日期早于入组日期)。发现疑问数据时,通过书面疑问表返回相应中心,由研究者查阅原始记录后补充或更正。所有数据修改过程均需留痕,确保可追溯。 5)缺失数据处理 对于关键指标的缺失,首先联系中心核实补充。确认为无法获取的缺失数据,将在分析前评估其缺失类型(完全随机缺失、随机缺失或非随机缺失),具体处理方法详见研究方案第5.3节。 6)数据安全与保存 所有研究资料(包括原始病历、CRF、影像资料、电子数据库)由各中心妥善保管。电子数据定期备份(建议每周增量备份、每月全量备份),防止丢失。研究结束后,相关资料按照临床试验管理要求保存至少5年。受试者身份信息在数据分析时进行脱敏处理,保护受试者隐私。 |
|
Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture: |
1) Data Recording ToolsA Case Report Form (CRF) was specifically designed for this study to record data, including subjects’ basic information (gender, age, height, weight), medical history (smoking history, history of systemic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes, medication history, surgical history, confirmed history of thyroid dysfunction, confirmed history of TAO), clinical examination results (visual acuity and refraction results, thyroid function tests, CAS score, intraocular pressure, proptosis, visual field, synoptophore, binocular vision function tests, ocular alignment photography), scoring scales (quality of life questionnaire), and imaging examinations (orbital CT). All participating researchers received standardized training to ensure a consistent understanding of the definitions, measurement methods, and recording requirements for each indicator.2) Data Entry and VerificationEach center designated a specific person responsible for data entry. An Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system was prioritized to improve the efficiency and quality of data collection, with data validation rules and logic checks to promptly identify and correct entry errors, ensuring data authenticity and reliability. For centers temporarily unable to use the EDC, paper CRFs were used, and data were subsequently entered into the unified electronic data template provided by the lead center. A double-entry with independent entry by two individuals followed by cross-verification was adopted: two persons entered the same data separately, and after completion, the entries were compared. Any inconsistencies were corrected by tracing back to the original records. Regardless of the method used, data entry was completed within one week after each follow-up visit.3) Data Verification and Quality ControlEach center’s principal investigator was responsible for the authenticity and completeness of the data at their site. Before submission, designated personnel verified key indicators against the original medical records, and confirmed accuracy with their signature. The lead center conducted regular data quality audits, every three months, sampling no less than 20% of enrolled cases from each center. The audit covered data completeness, consistency with original records, and protocol compliance. If issues were identified, the lead center issued written feedback, and the relevant center completed verification and submitted corrections within two weeks.4) Data Cleaning and Query ResolutionPrior to statistical analysis, statisticians performed logic checks on the pooled database, focusing on missing values, outliers, and logical inconsistencies (e.g., surgery date earlier than enrollment date). When questionable data were found, a written query form was sent to the corresponding center, and the investigator supplemented or corrected the data after reviewing the original records. All data modifications were documented to ensure traceability.5) Handling of Missing DataFor missing key indicators, the center was first contacted to verify and supplement the data. If the data were confirmed to be unobtainable, the type of missingness (missing completely at random, missing at random, or not missing at random) was assessed prior to analysis. Specific handling methods are detailed in Section 5.3 of the study protocol.6) Data Security and StorageAll study materials (including original medical records, CRFs, imaging data, and electronic databases) were properly stored by each center. Electronic data were regularly backed up (recommended weekly incremental backups and monthly full backups) to prevent loss. After the study concluded, relevant materials were kept for at least five years in accordance with clinical trial management requirements. Subject identity information was de-identified during data analysis to protect participant privacy. |
|
数据与安全监察委员会: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: |
无/No |