基于双轨管理的SBAR交接模式对ICU患者早期预警事件识别率及临床结局的影响

注册号:

Registration number:

ChiCTR2600125750 

最近更新日期:

Date of Last Refreshed on:

2026-05-30 18:35:34 

注册时间:

Date of Registration:

2026-05-30 00:00:00 

注册号状态:

预注册

Registration Status:

Prospective registration

注册题目:

基于双轨管理的SBAR交接模式对ICU患者早期预警事件识别率及临床结局的影响

Public title:

The Impact of the SBAR Handover Model Based on Dual-Track Management on Early Warning Event Recognition and Clinical Outcomes in ICU Patients

注册题目简写:

English Acronym:

研究课题的正式科学名称:

基于双轨管理的SBAR交接模式对ICU患者早期预警事件识别率及临床结局的影响

Scientific title:

The Impact of the SBAR Handover Model Based on Dual-Track Management on Early Warning Event Recognition and Clinical Outcomes in ICU Patients

研究课题代号(代码):

Study subject ID:

在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号:

The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register:

申请注册联系人:

肖梅霞 

研究负责人:

肖梅霞 

Applicant:

Xiao meixia 

Study leader:

xiaomeixia 

申请注册联系人电话:

Applicant telephone:

+86 157 7973 8052

研究负责人电话:

Study leader's
telephone:

+86 791 8869 2533

申请注册联系人传真 :

Applicant Fax:

研究负责人传真:

Study leader's fax:

申请注册联系人电子邮件:

Applicant E-mail:

1481318045@qq.com

研究负责人电子邮件:

Study leader's E-mail:

1481318045@qq.com

申请单位网址(自愿提供):

Applicant website(voluntary supply):

研究负责人网址(自愿提供):

Study leader's website(voluntary supply):

申请注册联系人通讯地址:

南昌市东湖区永外正街17号

研究负责人通讯地址:

南昌市东湖区永外正街17号

Applicant address:

17# Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China

Study leader's address:

17# Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China

申请注册联系人邮政编码:

Applicant postcode:

研究负责人邮政编码:

Study leader's postcode:

申请人所在单位:

南昌大学第一附属医院

Applicant's institution:

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

研究负责人所在单位:

南昌大学第一附属医院

Affiliation of the Leader:

The first affiliated hostipal of nanchang university

是否获伦理委员会批准:

Approved by ethic committee:

Yes

伦理委员会批件文号:

Approved No. of ethic committee:

IIT[2026]临伦审第198号

伦理委员会批件附件:

Approved file of Ethical Committee:

查看附件View

批准本研究的伦理委员会名称:

南昌大学第一附属医院医学伦理委员会(IIT分会)

Name of the ethic committee:

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Institutional Review Board (IIT)

伦理委员会批准日期:

Date of approved by ethic committee:

2026-02-13 00:00:00

伦理委员会联系人:

舒展

Contact Name of the ethic committee:

Shu Zhan

伦理委员会联系地址:

南昌市东湖区永外正街17号

Contact Address of the ethic committee:

17# Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China

伦理委员会联系人电话:

Contact phone of the ethic committee:

+86 791 8869 2201

伦理委员会联系人邮箱:

Contact email of the ethic committee:

493831410@qq.com

研究实施负责(组长)单位:

南昌大学第一附属医院

Primary sponsor:

The first affiliated hostipal of nanchang university

研究实施负责(组长)单位地址:

南昌市东湖区永外正街17号

Primary sponsor's address:

17# Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China

试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者):

Secondary sponsor:

国家:

中国

省(直辖市):

江西省

市(区县):

Country:

China

Province:

Jiangxi

City:

单位(医院):

南昌大学第一附属医院

具体地址:

南昌市东湖区永外正街17号

Institution
hospital:

The first affiliated hostipal of nanchang university

Address:

17# Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China

经费或物资来源:

自选课题(自筹)

Source(s) of funding:

Self-Selected Topic

研究疾病:

患者交接班模式的改进  

Target disease:

Improvement of Patient Handover Models

研究疾病代码:

Target disease code:

研究类型:

干预性研究

Study type:

Interventional study

研究所处阶段:

其它 

Study phase:

N/A

研究设计:

非随机对照试验 

Study design:

Non randomized control 

研究目的:

评估基于双轨管理的SBAR交接模式与传统交接模式相比,对ICU患者早期预警事件识别率的提升效果,明确该模式在风险预警方面的优势  

Objectives of Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the SBAR handover model based on dual-track management in improving the early warning event recognition rate in ICU patients compared to the traditional handover model, and to clarify its advantages in risk warning

药物成份或治疗方案详述:

 

Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail:

 

纳入标准:

Inclusion criteria

排除标准:

1.研究期间长期休假(如产假、病假)或外出进修者;
2.轮转、实习或规培护士;

Exclusion criteria:

1.Those who take long-term leave (such as maternity leave, sick leave) or go out for further studies during the research period;
2.Rotating, intern, or resident nurses;

研究实施时间:

Study execute time:

From 2026-03-01 00:00:00 To 2027-12-31 00:00:00  

征募观察对象时间:

Recruiting time:

From 2026-06-01 00:00:00 To 2027-12-31 00:00:00

干预措施:

Interventions:

组别:

双轨管理模式前

样本量:

39

Group:

Prior to the implementation of the dual-track management model

Sample size:

干预措施:

实施常规SBAR交接模式管理

干预措施代码:

Intervention:

Implementing the conventional SBAR handover model management

Intervention code:

组别:

双轨管理模式后

样本量:

39

Group:

After the implementation of the dual-track management model

Sample size:

干预措施:

赋能与监督双轨模式

干预措施代码:

Intervention:

The Empowerment and Supervision Dual-Track Model

Intervention code:

研究实施地点:

Countries of recruitment and research settings:

国家:

中国

省(直辖市):

江西省 

市(区县):

 

Country:

China

Province:

Jiangxi

City:

单位(医院):

南昌大学第一附属医院 

单位级别:

三级甲等 

Institution
hospital:

The first affiliated hostipal of nanchang university

Level of the institution:

Tertiary A

测量指标:

Outcomes:

指标中文名:

护士对ICU患者早期预警事件的识别率

指标类型:

主要指标

Outcome:

The recognition rate of early warning events in ICU patients by nurses

Type:

Primary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

识别率=正确识别的早期预警事件数/同期ICU患者实际发生的早期预警事件总数×100%。

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

Recognition rate = (Number of early warning events correctly identified / Total number of actual early warning events occurred in ICU patients during the same period) × 100%

指标中文名:

床旁交接班遗漏率

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Bedside handover omission rate

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

床旁交接班遗漏率=遗漏项目数/应交接项目数)×100%。每日早交班时,由5名协班和护士长组成检查组,负责资料收集。检查方法为观察护士行为、翻阅护理记录单、查阅医嘱、旁听护士床旁交接班。

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

The bedside handover omission rate is calculated as (Number of omitted items / Number of items that should be handed over) × 100%. Every day during the morning shift handover, a team composed of five assistant nurses and the head nurse is responsible for data collection. The methods of inspection include observing the behavior of nurses, reviewing nursing records, checking medical orders, and listening in on the bedside handover conducted by nurses.

指标中文名:

护士专业自我效能感评分

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Nurse Professional Self-Efficacy Score

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

采用护士专业自我效能感量表评估护士自我效能感情况,量表由Caruso等[16]得分越高表明护士专业自我效能水平越高,量表的 Cronbach’s α系数为0.87,重测信度为0.83,信效度良好

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

The Nurse Professional Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess the level of nurses' self-efficacy. The scale, developed by Caruso et al. [16], indicates a higher level of professional self-efficacy among nurses with higher scores. The scale has a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.87 and a test-retest reliability of 0.83, demonstrating good reliability and validity

指标中文名:

接近失误事件发生率

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Near-miss incident occurrence rate

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

接近失误事件发生率=(接近失误事件例数/总患者例数)×100%

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

Near-miss incident occurrence rate = (Number of near-miss incidents / Total number of patients) × 100%

指标中文名:

护理交接班评分

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Nursing Handover Score

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

使用中文版护士交班评估量表评估,该量表Cronbach’s a系数为0.907,重测信度为0.910。分别从信息质量、互动和支持、效率3方面对交班情况进行评价。使用1~5分5级评分法,分数越高代表交班质量越好,该量表共有13个条目,总分65分

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

The Chinese version of the Nurse Handover Assessment Scale was used for evaluation. The scale has a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.907 and a test-retest reliability of 0.910. It evaluates the handover situation from three aspects: information quality, interaction and support, and efficiency. A 5-point rating method from 1 to 5 is used, with higher scores indicating better handover quality. The scale consists of 13 items, with a total score of 65 points.

指标中文名:

医护合作评分

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Interprofessional Collaboration Score

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

该量表最早由日本学者研制[17],2014年陈静等对其汉化[18],中文版医护合作量表由3个维度21个条目组成。总表的Cronbach's α系数为0.949,Guttman折半信度为0.885,本表具有良好的信效度。采用Liker5分制计分法总分范围为21~105分,得分越高,表示合作的状况越好。

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

The scale was originally developed by Japanese scholars [17], and in 2014, Chen Jing et al. translated it into Chinese . The Chinese version of the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale consists of three dimensions and 21 items. The total scale has a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.949 and a Guttman split-half reliability of 0.885, indicating good reliability and validity. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scoring method, with a total score ranging from 21 to 105 points. Higher scores indicate bette

指标中文名:

干预前后交接班时间

指标类型:

次要指标

Outcome:

Handover time before and after the intervention

Type:

Secondary indicator

测量时间点:

干预前、干预后3个月、干预后6个月

测量方法:

由护理组长或护士长采用计时器统计,以接班护士核对患者身份信息为开始时间,以双方确认无误为结束时间

Measure time point of outcome:

Before intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention

Measure method:

The timing is conducted by the nursing team leader or the head nurse using a timer. The start time is when the oncoming nurse begins to verify the patient's identification information, and the end time is when both parties confirm that there are no errors.

采集人体标本:

Collecting sample(s)
from participants:

标本中文名:

组织:

Sample Name:

NA

Tissue:

人体标本去向

其它  

说明

Fate of sample:

0thers  

Note:

征募研究对象情况:

Recruiting status:

尚未开始

Not yet recruiting

年龄范围:

Participant age:

最小 Min age 20 years
最大 Max age 50 years

性别:

男女均可

Gender:

Both

随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列):

Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method):

None

是否公开试验完成后的统计结果:

Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access:

不公开/Private

盲法:

Blinding:

None

是否共享原始数据:

IPD sharing

否No

共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址):

不共享

The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url):

Not sharing

数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC:

数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form,CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统 (Electronic Data Capture, EDC)

Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture:

Data collection and management consist of two parts: one is the Case Record Form (CRF), and the other is the Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system

数据与安全监察委员会:

Data and Safety Monitoring Committee:

无/No

注册人:

Name of Registration:

 2026-05-30 18:35:27