|
注册号: Registration number: |
ChiCTR2500114639 |
|
最近更新日期: Date of Last Refreshed on: |
2025-12-16 08:50:56 |
|
注册时间: Date of Registration: |
2025-12-16 00:00:00 |
|
注册号状态: |
预注册 |
|
Registration Status: |
Prospective registration |
|
注册题目: |
两种神经阻滞方式对肋骨手术镇痛效果的比较 |
|
Public title: |
Comparison of the analgesic effects of two nerve block methods on rib surgery |
|
注册题目简写: |
|
|
English Acronym: |
|
|
研究课题的正式科学名称: |
超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞对多发肋骨骨折患者镇痛效果的随机对照研究 |
|
Scientific title: |
The analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block in patients with multiple rib fractures: A randomized controlled study |
|
研究课题代号(代码): Study subject ID: |
|
|
在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号: The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register: |
|
申请注册联系人: |
张龙 |
研究负责人: |
张龙 |
|
Applicant: |
Long Zhang |
Study leader: |
Long Zhang |
|
申请注册联系人电话: Applicant telephone: |
+86 13686737816 |
研究负责人电话:
Study leader's |
+86 575 87996056 |
|
申请注册联系人传真 : Applicant Fax: |
研究负责人传真: Study leader's fax: |
||
|
申请注册联系人电子邮件: Applicant E-mail: |
nblylmz@126.com |
研究负责人电子邮件: Study leader's E-mail: |
nblylmz@126.com |
|
申请单位网址(自愿提供): Applicant website(voluntary supply): |
研究负责人网址(自愿提供): Study leader's website(voluntary supply): |
||
|
申请注册联系人通讯地址: |
宁波市鄞州区中山东路1059号 |
研究负责人通讯地址: |
宁波市鄞州区中山东路1059号 |
|
Applicant address: |
No. 1059 Zhongshan East Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo |
Study leader's address: |
No. 1059, Zhongshan East Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo |
|
申请注册联系人邮政编码: Applicant postcode: |
研究负责人邮政编码: Study leader's postcode: |
||
|
申请人所在单位: |
宁波市第六医院 |
||
|
Applicant's institution: |
Ningbo No.6 Hospital |
||
|
研究负责人所在单位: |
宁波市第六医院 |
||
|
Affiliation of the Leader: |
Ningbo No.6 Hospital |
||
|
是否获伦理委员会批准: |
是 |
||
|
Approved by ethic committee: |
Yes |
||
|
伦理委员会批件文号: Approved No. of ethic committee: |
甬六医伦审2025研第10号 |
伦理委员会批件附件: Approved file of Ethical Committee: |
查看附件View |
|
批准本研究的伦理委员会名称: |
宁波市第六医院伦理审查委员会 |
||
|
Name of the ethic committee: |
Ethics Review Committee of Ningbo NO.6 Hospital |
||
|
伦理委员会批准日期: Date of approved by ethic committee: |
2025-09-29 00:00:00 | ||
|
伦理委员会联系人: |
季远见 |
||
|
Contact Name of the ethic committee: |
Ji YuanJian |
||
|
伦理委员会联系地址: |
宁波市鄞州区中山东路1059号 |
||
|
Contact Address of the ethic committee: |
No. 1059, Zhongshan East Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人电话: Contact phone of the ethic committee: |
+86 574 87996165 |
伦理委员会联系人邮箱: Contact email of the ethic committee: |
1024522771@qq.com |
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位: |
宁波市第六医院 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor: |
Ningbo No.6 Hospital |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位地址: |
宁波市鄞州区中山东路1059号 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor's address: |
No. 1059, Zhongshan East Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者): Secondary sponsor: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
经费或物资来源: |
浙江省卫生健康行业科技计划 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source(s) of funding: |
Zhejiang Provincial Health and Wellness Industry Science and Technology Program |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病: |
多发肋骨骨折 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease: |
Multiple rib fractures are a common type of injury in clinical practice, typically caused by severe external forces such as traffic accidents or falls from heights. Due to the disruption of rib continuity, the stability of the patient's chest wall is significantly affected, which may lead to a series of respiratory and circulatory complications. In cases where patients suffer from severe fracture |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病代码: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease code: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究类型: |
干预性研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study type: |
Interventional study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究所处阶段: |
其它 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study phase: |
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究设计: |
随机平行对照 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study design: |
Parallel |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究目的: |
(1)明确超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞在MRFs患者中的镇痛效果差异,评估两种阻滞方式对疼痛控制的有效性,具体包括确定哪种阻滞方式能更有效地降低疼痛评分、扩大阻滞范围、减少镇痛药物使用量以及延长镇痛持续时间。 (2)探究超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞对MRFs患者呼吸循环功能的影响,分析两种阻滞方式对生命体征、呼吸功能参数及术后肺部并发症发生率的具体作用,以评估其对患者生理功能的保护效果。 (3)评估超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞对MRFs患者术后康复进程的影响,通过对比短期康复评分、生活自理评分以及慢性疼痛发生率等指标,明确哪种阻滞方式更有利于促进患者的术后恢复。 (4)探究超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞对MRFs手术患者镇痛的最低有效浓度,以指导临床应用,并比较分析两者的差异,明确哪种阻滞方式更。 (5)分析超声引导下PSIP阻滞与RISS阻滞的安全性和实用性,记录神经阻滞相关并发症的发生情况,比较两种阻滞方式的操作难度和学习曲线,为临床推广提供可靠依据。 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives of Study: |
(1) To clarify the differences in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block in patients with MRFs, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the two block methods in pain control, specifically including determining which block method can more effectively reduce pain scores, expand the block range, reduce the use of analgesic drugs, and prolong the duration of analgesia. (2) To explore the effects of ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block on respiratory and circulatory functions in patients with MRFs, and to analyze the specific effects of the two block methods on vital signs, respiratory function parameters, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, in order to assess their protective effects on patients' physiological functions; (3) To evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block on the postoperative recovery process of patients with MRFs, by comparing short-term recovery scores, self-care ability scores, and the incidence of chronic pain, to determine which block method is more conducive to promoting postoperative recovery; (4) To explore the minimum effective concentration of ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block for analgesia in MRFs surgery patients, to guide clinical application, and to compare and analyze the differences between the two, to determine which block method is more effective. (5) Analyze the safety and practicality of ultrasound-guided PSIP block and RISS block. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
药物成份或治疗方案详述: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
纳入标准: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inclusion criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
排除标准: |
1.参与其他临床干预试验; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusion criteria: |
1.Participate in other clinical intervention trials; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施时间: Study execute time: |
从 From 2026-01-01 00:00:00至 To 2028-12-31 00:00:00 |
征募观察对象时间: Recruiting time: |
从 From 2026-01-01 00:00:00 至 To 2028-12-31 00:00:00 |
|
干预措施: Interventions: |
|
|
研究实施地点: Countries of recruitment and research settings: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
测量指标: Outcomes: |
|
|
采集人体标本:
Collecting sample(s)
|
|
|
征募研究对象情况: Recruiting status: |
尚未开始 Not yet recruiting |
年龄范围: Participant age: |
|
||||||
|
性别: |
男女均可 |
Gender: |
Both |
||||||
|
随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列): |
由不参与主体试验的人员在研究开始前使用电脑随机数列进行随机分组,并使用信封封存,患者入组后打开信封获取分组信息。 |
||||||||
|
Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method): |
Before the study begins, personnel not involved in the main trial use computer-generated random sequences to randomly assign groups, which are then sealed in envelopes. After patients are enrolled, the envelopes are opened to reveal the group assignments. |
||||||||
|
是否公开试验完成后的统计结果: Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access: |
不公开/Private |
|
盲法: |
双盲 |
|
Blinding: |
Double blind |
|
是否共享原始数据: IPD sharing |
是Yes |
|
共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址): |
研究结束的6个月后可以通过联系研究负责人(nblylmz@126.com)获取原始数据 |
|
The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url): |
Six months after the study concludes, the original data can be obtained by contacting the study leader (nblylmz@126.com). |
|
数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC: |
所有数据通过病例记录表记录,有专人专管,避免信息干扰和泄露。最终数据使用电子表格管理和保存。 |
|
Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture: |
All data is recorded through case report forms, managed by dedicated personnel to avoid information interference and leakage. The final data is managed and stored using electronic spreadsheets. |
|
数据与安全监察委员会: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: |
无/No |