|
审核状态: Project audit state: |
通过审核 Successful |
|
注册号: Registration number: |
ChiCTR2600126909 |
|
最近更新日期: Date of Last Refreshed on: |
2026-06-18 15:44:32 |
|
注册时间: Date of Registration: |
2026-06-18 00:00:00 |
|
注册号状态: |
预注册 |
|
Registration Status: |
Prospective registration |
|
注册题目: |
乳腺癌患者上肢握力减退的中枢-外周神经机制研究:基于EEG-EMG联合分析 |
|
Public title: |
Central?Peripheral Neural Mechanisms of Upper Limb Grip Strength Decline in Breast Cancer Patients: A Combined EEG?EMG Study |
|
注册题目简写: |
|
|
English Acronym: |
|
|
研究课题的正式科学名称: |
乳腺癌患者上肢握力减退的中枢-外周神经机制研究:基于EEG-EMG联合分析 |
|
Scientific title: |
Central?Peripheral Neural Mechanisms of Upper Limb Grip Strength Decline in Breast Cancer Patients: A Combined EEG?EMG Study |
|
研究课题代号(代码): Study subject ID: |
|
|
在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号: The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register: |
|
申请注册联系人: |
赵月华 |
研究负责人: |
贾杰 |
|
Applicant: |
Yuehua Zhao |
Study leader: |
Jie Jia |
|
申请注册联系人电话: Applicant telephone: |
+86 21 52887820 |
研究负责人电话: Study leader's telephone: |
+86 21 52887820 |
|
申请注册联系人传真 : Applicant Fax: |
研究负责人传真: Study leader's fax: |
||
|
申请注册联系人电子邮件: Applicant E-mail: |
236637276@qq.com |
研究负责人电子邮件: Study leader's E-mail: |
shannonjj@126.com |
|
申请单位网址(自愿提供): Applicant website(voluntary supply): |
研究负责人网址(自愿提供): Study leader's website(voluntary supply): |
||
|
申请注册联系人通讯地址: |
上海市静安区西康路259号 |
研究负责人通讯地址: |
上海市静安区西康路259号 |
|
Applicant address: |
No.259 Xikang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China |
Study leader's address: |
No.259 Xikang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China |
|
申请注册联系人邮政编码: Applicant postcode: |
研究负责人邮政编码: Study leader's postcode: |
||
|
申请人所在单位: |
上海市静安区中心医院 |
||
|
Applicant's institution: |
Jing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai |
||
|
研究负责人所在单位: |
复旦大学附属华山医院 |
||
|
Affiliation of the Leader: |
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University |
||
|
是否获伦理委员会批准: |
是/Yes |
||
|
Approved by ethic committee: |
Yes |
||
|
伦理委员会批件文号: Approved No. of ethic committee: |
(2026)伦审第(42)号 |
伦理委员会批件附件: Approved file of Ethical Committee: |
查看附件View |
|
批准本研究的伦理委员会名称: |
上海市静安区中心医院医学伦理委员会 |
||
|
Name of the ethic committee: |
Ethics Committee OF Jing'an District Central Hospital Of Shanghai |
||
|
伦理委员会批准日期: Date of approved by ethic committee: |
2026-05-22 00:00:00 |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人: |
顾北令 |
||
|
Contact Name of the ethic committee: |
Gu Beiling |
||
|
伦理委员会联系地址: |
上海市静安区西康路259号 |
||
|
Contact Address of the ethic committee: |
No.259 Xikang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人电话: Contact phone of the ethic committee: |
+86 21 61578078 |
伦理委员会联系人邮箱: Contact email of the ethic committee: |
jzxywb1@126.com |
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位: |
上海市静安区中心医院 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor: |
Jing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位地址: |
上海市静安区西康路259号 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor's address: |
No.259 Xikang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, China |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者): Secondary sponsor: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
经费或物资来源: |
自选课题(自筹) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source(s) of funding: |
self funding |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease: |
breast cancer; cancer-related fatigue |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease code: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究类型: |
观察性研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study type: |
Observational study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究所处阶段: |
探索性研究/预试验 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study phase: |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究设计: |
横断面 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study design: |
Cross-sectional |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究目的: |
1.主要目的: (1) 揭示乳腺癌患者与健康对照者在中枢-外周神经耦合性的在上肢运动任务时差异。 (2) 探究乳腺癌患者疲劳程度(FACIT-F评分)与EEG-EMG相干性、握力值之间的量化关联。 2.次要目的: (1) 探索上肢握力减退与自主神经功能(HRV)、患者报告结局(DASH、VAS、PHQ-9等)及血清炎症因子(IL-6、TNF-α)之间的相关性。 (2) 比较不同手术方式(保乳手术 vs 乳房全切术)及不同腋窝淋巴结清扫范围(前哨淋巴结活检 vs 腋窝淋巴结清扫I级/II级) 对 EEG-EMG 相干性的影响。 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives of Study: |
1. Main Purpose: (1) To reveal differences in central-peripheral neural coupling in upper limb motor tasks between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. (2) To explore the quantitative association between fatigue levels (FACIT-F scores) and EEG-EMG coherence and grip strength values in breast cancer patients. 2. Secondary Purpose: (1) To explore the correlation between upper limb grip weakness and autonomic function (HRV), patient-reported outcomes (DASH, VAS, PHQ-9, etc.), and serum inflammatory factors (IL-6, TNF-α). (2) Compare the effects of different surgical methods (breast-conserving surgery vs. total mastectomy) and different axillary lymph node dissection ranges (sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. Grade I/II axillary lymph node dissection) on EEG-EMG coherence. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
药物成份或治疗方案详述: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
纳入标准: |
1.A组:乳腺癌伴持续性握力减退组: (1)经组织病理学确诊为原发性单侧乳腺癌女性,年龄20-75岁。乳腺癌分期不限(I期至III期均可纳入) ,IV期(转移性)患者不纳入本研究; (2)已完成乳腺癌手术(不限手术方式:保乳手术或乳房全切术),且手术后时间 ≥ 1个月(不限是否完成化疗); (3)握力减退的判定标准分情况讨论(以下“握力”均指采用Jamar电子握力计、遵循ASHT标准化姿势测量、取3次最大值):情况一:手术侧 = 优势手,患侧(优势手)握力 < 健侧(非优势手)握力的85% 。依据Foley等人(2025)系统综述,优势手比非优势手平均强11.6%,中国人群数据优势手高9%,因此握力比值<85%视为超出正常生理不对称范围,判定为显著握力减退。情况二:手术侧 ≠ 优势手,患侧(非优势手)握力 < 健侧(优势手)握力的80% 。此时健侧为优势手,天然握力基线高于患侧,采用<80%的阈值排除利手差异后判定握力显著下降; (4)FACIT-F ≤ 40(存在明显癌因性疲劳)。FACIT-F总分0~52分,分数越低疲劳越重,MCID为2.4分; (5)能够理解研究内容,配合完成EEG/EMG评估; (6)签署知情同意书。 2.B组:乳腺癌伴握力恢复良好组: (1)经组织病理学确诊为原发性单侧乳腺癌女性,年龄20-75岁。乳腺癌分期不限(I期至III期均可纳入); (2)已完成乳腺癌手术(不限手术方式),且手术后时间 ≥ 1个月(不限是否完成化疗); (3)握力恢复的判定标准分情况讨论:情况一:手术侧 = 优势手,患侧(优势手)握力 ≥ 健侧(非优势手)握力的85% 。即手术后患侧握力不低于对侧基线水平,表明功能恢复良好。情况二:手术侧 ≠ 优势手,患侧(非优势手)握力 ≥ 健侧(优势手)握力的80% 。由于健侧天然强于患侧约11.6%,患侧达到健侧的95%已相当于恢复到接近术前的基线水平,可判定为握力恢复良好; (4)FACIT-F > 40(无明显疲劳); (5)能够理解研究内容,配合完成EEG/EMG评估; (6)签署知情同意书; 3.C组:健康对照组: (1)健康女性,年龄20-75岁; (2)年龄、性别、教育年限与乳腺癌组匹配; (3)无上肢功能障碍及重大疾病史; (4)能够理解研究内容,配合完成EEG/EMG评估; (5)签署知情同意书; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inclusion criteria |
1.Group A: Breast cancer with persistent grip weakness Group: (1) Women diagnosed by histopathology with primary unilateral breast cancer, aged 20-75 years. Breast cancer stages were not limited (stages I to III could be included); stage IV (metastatic) patients were not included in this study; (2) Completed breast cancer surgery (no surgical method restricted: breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy), with a postoperative time of >= 1 month (regardless of whether chemotherapy was completed); (3) Discussion of criteria for determining grip strength decline (the following "grip strength" refers to using a Jamar electronic grip strength scale, following ASHT standardized posture measurement, and taking the maximum value three times): Case 1: Surgical side = dominant hand, the affected side (dominant hand) grip strength < 85% of the healthy side (non-dominant hand) grip strength. According to Foley et al. (2025) systematic review, the dominant hand is on average 11.6% stronger than the non-dominant hand, while the dominant hand is 9% higher in Chinese data. Therefore, a grip strength ratio of <85% is considered outside the normal physiological asymmetry range and is judged as significant grasp strength decline. Scenario 2: Dominant hand on the surgical side ≠, grip strength on the affected side (non-dominant hand) < 80% of the grip strength on the healthy side (dominant hand). At this time, the healthy side is the dominant hand, with a natural baseline of grip strength higher than the affected side. After using a <80% threshold to exclude differences in dominant hand, it is determined that grip strength has significantly decreased; (4) FACIT-F <= 40 (with significant oncogenic fatigue). FACIT-F total score 0~52 points; the lower the score, the heavier the fatigue; MCID is 2.4; (5) Able to understand the study content and cooperate in completing EEG/EMG assessments; (6) Sign the informed consent form. 2.Group B: Breast cancer with good grip strength recovery Group: (1) Women diagnosed by histopathology with primary unilateral breast cancer, aged 20-75. Breast cancer stages are not limited (stages I to III are included); (2) Breast cancer surgery has been completed (any surgical method), with >= 1 month post-surgery (regardless of whether chemotherapy was completed); (3) Criteria for determining grip strength recovery Discussion by situation: Case 1: Surgical side = dominant hand, affected side (dominant hand) grip strength >= healthy side (non-dominant hand) grip strength 85%. That is, postoperative grip strength on the affected side is not lower than the contralateral baseline, indicating good functional recovery. Case 2: Surgical side ≠ dominant hand, affected side (non-dominant hand) grip strength >= 80% of healthy side (dominant hand) grip strength. Since the healthy side is naturally about 11.6% stronger than the affected side, reaching 95% of the healthy side is equivalent to returning to the preoperative baseline level, indicating good grip strength recovery; (4) FACIT-F > 40 (no obvious fatigue); (5) Able to understand the research content and cooperate in completing EEG/EMG assessments; (6) Sign the informed consent form; 3.Group C: Healthy control group: (1) healthy women, aged 20-75; (2) Age, gender, and years of education matched to the breast cancer group; (3) No upper limb dysfunction or history of major illness; (4) Able to understand the research content and cooperate in completing EEG/EMG assessments; (5) Sign the informed consent form; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
排除标准: |
1.术前患侧上肢已存在功能障碍、外伤、神经肌肉疾病或淋巴水肿; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusion criteria: |
1.Preoperative dysfunction, trauma, neuromuscular disease, or lymphedema in the affected upper limb; |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施时间: Study execute time: |
从 From 2026-06-30 00:00:00至 To 2028-05-31 00:00:00 |
征募观察对象时间: Recruiting time: |
从From 2026-06-30 00:00:00 至 To 2027-06-30 00:00:00 |
|
干预措施: Interventions: |
|
|
研究实施地点: Countries of recruitment and research settings: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
测量指标: Outcomes: |
|
|
采集人体标本:
Collecting sample(s)
|
|
|
征募研究对象情况: Recruiting status: |
尚未开始 Not yet recruiting |
年龄范围: Participant age: |
|
||||||
|
性别: |
女性 |
Gender: |
Female |
||||||
|
随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列): |
无 |
||||||||
|
Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method): |
None |
||||||||
|
是否公开试验完成后的统计结果: Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access: |
不公开/Private |
|
盲法: |
无 |
|
Blinding: |
None |
|
是否共享原始数据: IPD sharing |
No |
|
共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址): |
不共享 |
|
The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url): |
Not shared |
|
数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC: |
数据采集采用CRF表,数据管理采用电子数据库进行管理。 |
|
Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture: |
Data collection is performed using CRF forms, and data management is conducted via anelectronic database. |
|
数据与安全监察委员会: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: |
无/No |