|
审核状态: Project audit state: |
通过审核 Successful |
|
注册号: Registration number: |
ChiCTR2500113083 |
|
最近更新日期: Date of Last Refreshed on: |
2025-11-24 18:07:55 |
|
注册时间: Date of Registration: |
2025-11-24 00:00:00 |
|
注册号状态: |
预注册 |
|
Registration Status: |
Prospective registration |
|
注册题目: |
An evidence-based advance care planning programme to promote end-of-life care planning among patients with advanced diseases in the Emergency Department – a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
|
Public title: |
An evidence-based ACP programme to promote EOL planning among patients with advanced diseases in the ED – a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
|
注册题目简写: |
|
|
English Acronym: |
|
|
研究课题的正式科学名称: |
An evidence-based advance care planning programme to promote end-of-life care planning among patients with advanced diseases in the Emergency Department – a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
|
Scientific title: |
An evidence-based advance care planning programme to promote end-of-life care planning among patients with advanced diseases in the Emergency Department – a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
|
研究课题代号(代码): Study subject ID: |
|
|
在二级注册机构或其它机构的注册号: The registration number of the Partner Registry or other register: |
|
申请注册联系人: |
LEUNG Po Shan Melissa |
研究负责人: |
LEUNG Po Shan Melissa |
|
Applicant: |
LEUNG Po Shan Melissa |
Study leader: |
LEUNG Po Shan Melissa |
|
申请注册联系人电话: Applicant telephone: |
+852 9121 3016 |
研究负责人电话:
Study leader's |
+852 9121 3016 |
|
申请注册联系人传真 : Applicant Fax: |
研究负责人传真: Study leader's fax: |
||
|
申请注册联系人电子邮件: Applicant E-mail: |
1155005007@link.cuhk.edu.hk |
研究负责人电子邮件: Study leader's E-mail: |
1155005007@link.cuhk.edu.hk |
|
申请单位网址(自愿提供): Applicant website(voluntary supply): |
研究负责人网址(自愿提供): Study leader's website(voluntary supply): |
||
|
申请注册联系人通讯地址: |
2-10 Princess Margaret Hospital Road, Kowloon, HKSAR |
研究负责人通讯地址: |
2-10 Princess Margaret Hospital Road, Kowloon, HKSAR |
|
Applicant address: |
2-10 Princess Margaret Hospital Road, Kowloon, HKSAR |
Study leader's address: |
2-10 Princess Margaret Hospital Road, Kowloon, HKSAR |
|
申请注册联系人邮政编码: Applicant postcode: |
研究负责人邮政编码: Study leader's postcode: |
||
|
申请人所在单位: |
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Nethersole School of Nursing |
||
|
Applicant's institution: |
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Nethersole School of Nursing |
||
|
研究负责人所在单位: |
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Nethersole School of Nursing |
||
|
Affiliation of the Leader: |
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Nethersole School of Nursing |
||
|
是否获伦理委员会批准: |
是 |
||
|
Approved by ethic committee: |
Yes |
||
|
伦理委员会批件文号: Approved No. of ethic committee: |
Central IRB - Research Ethics Application (Ref: CIRB-2025-303-1) |
伦理委员会批件附件: Approved file of Ethical Committee: |
查看附件View |
|
批准本研究的伦理委员会名称: |
Hospital Authority Central Institutional Review Board |
||
|
Name of the ethic committee: |
Hospital Authority Central Institutional Review Board |
||
|
伦理委员会批准日期: Date of approved by ethic committee: |
2025-10-30 00:00:00 | ||
|
伦理委员会联系人: |
Ms Mandy LUK |
||
|
Contact Name of the ethic committee: |
Ms Mandy LUK |
||
|
伦理委员会联系地址: |
A 503, 5/F, Block A, Centre for Health Protection, 143a Argyle Street, Kowloon |
||
|
Contact Address of the ethic committee: |
A 503, 5/F, Block A, Centre for Health Protection, 143a Argyle Street, Kowloon |
||
|
伦理委员会联系人电话: Contact phone of the ethic committee: |
+852 2300 6431 |
伦理委员会联系人邮箱: Contact email of the ethic committee: |
hacco@ha.org.hk |
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位: |
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor: |
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施负责(组长)单位地址: |
The Nethersole School of Nursing 6-8/F, Esther Lee Building The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary sponsor's address: |
The Nethersole School of Nursing 6-8/F, Esther Lee Building The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
试验主办单位(项目批准或申办者): Secondary sponsor: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
经费或物资来源: |
None |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source(s) of funding: |
None |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病: |
Patients with advanced disease with a need for end-of-life care |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease: |
Patients with advanced disease with a need for end-of-life care |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究疾病代码: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Target disease code: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究类型: |
干预性研究 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study type: |
Interventional study |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究所处阶段: |
其它 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study phase: |
N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究设计: |
随机平行对照 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Study design: |
Parallel |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究目的: |
The study aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based ACP programme among patients with advanced diseases in the Emergency Department. The objectives of the study are to determine the feasibility of conducting an ACP programme in the ED based on recruitment and attrition rate, to examine the acceptability of the intervention based on satisfaction survey and qualitative comments on patient’s experiences, and to examine the preliminary effect of the programme on patient reported ACP readiness and evidence of ACP documentation on medical record. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives of Study: |
The study aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based ACP programme among patients with advanced diseases in the Emergency Department. The objectives of the study are to determine the feasibility of conducting an ACP programme in the ED based on recruitment and attrition rate, to examine the acceptability of the intervention based on satisfaction survey and qualitative comments on patient’s experiences, and to examine the preliminary effect of the programme on patient reported ACP readiness and evidence of ACP documentation on medical record. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
药物成份或治疗方案详述: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Description for medicine or protocol of treatment in detail: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
纳入标准: |
Subjects will be recruited from Emergency Medicine Wards, ED of two public hospitals in Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong. One of the ED is in Kwai Tsing District providing tertiary care while the other ED is located on Lantau Island providing tertiary and rehabilitation service.Participants are adult (18 years old or above) admitted to the EMW, Chinese-speaking, fulfill the two general and one clinical criterion stipulated in the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tools (SPICT?) (The University of Edinburgh, 2025). SPICT was developed as an instrument to identify patients at risk of dying within one year (Paulik et al., 2024). It has a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI) and a specificity of 0.72 (95% CI) in detecting life-limiting conditions (Paulik et al., 2024).By using this dual indicators approach, it allows a more comprehensive and personalized model of care for patients with advanced illnesses (Paulik et al., 2024). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inclusion criteria |
Subjects will be recruited from Emergency Medicine Wards, ED of two public hospitals in Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong. One of the ED is in Kwai Tsing District providing tertiary care while the other ED is located on Lantau Island providing tertiary and rehabilitation service.Participants are adult (18 years old or above) admitted to the EMW, Chinese-speaking, fulfill the two general and one clinical criterion stipulated in the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tools (SPICT?) (The University of Edinburgh, 2025). SPICT was developed as an instrument to identify patients at risk of dying within one year (Paulik et al., 2024). It has a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% CI) and a specificity of 0.72 (95% CI) in detecting life-limiting conditions (Paulik et al., 2024).By using this dual indicators approach, it allows a more comprehensive and personalized model of care for patients with advanced illnesses (Paulik et al., 2024). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
排除标准: |
Patients will be excluded if they are mentally incompetent determined based on the Diagnostic assessment Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM) (Marcantonio et al., 2015). The Chinese version of 3D-CAM can be used as a reliable and accurate instrument for delirium assessment, its sensitivity ranges from 85.7 to 100% and the specificity from 95.7 to 96.4% (Mu et al., 2020). Patients who were non-Chinese speaking, non-communicable, refusal or unable to give consent, altered sensorium or cognitive functions, physical unwell to receive the intervention, and with previous documented ACP or AMD will be excluded from the study. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exclusion criteria: |
Patients will be excluded if they are mentally incompetent determined based on the Diagnostic assessment Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM) (Marcantonio et al., 2015). The Chinese version of 3D-CAM can be used as a reliable and accurate instrument for delirium assessment, its sensitivity ranges from 85.7 to 100% and the specificity from 95.7 to 96.4% (Mu et al., 2020). Patients who were non-Chinese speaking, non-communicable, refusal or unable to give consent, altered sensorium or cognitive functions, physical unwell to receive the intervention, and with previous documented ACP or AMD will be excluded from the study. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
研究实施时间: Study execute time: |
从 From 2025-11-24 00:00:00至 To 2026-10-25 00:00:00 |
征募观察对象时间: Recruiting time: |
从 From 2025-11-24 00:00:00 至 To 2026-10-25 00:00:00 |
|
干预措施: Interventions: |
|
|
研究实施地点: Countries of recruitment and research settings: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
测量指标: Outcomes: |
|
|
采集人体标本:
Collecting sample(s)
|
|
|
征募研究对象情况: Recruiting status: |
尚未开始 Not yet recruiting |
年龄范围: Participant age: |
|
||||||
|
性别: |
男女均可 |
Gender: |
Both |
||||||
|
随机方法(请说明由何人用什么方法产生随机序列): |
Eligible and consented patients will be randomised into intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio using the Random Sequence Generator (Prachanukool et al., 2022). |
||||||||
|
Randomization Procedure (please state who generates the random number sequence and by what method): |
Eligible and consented patients will be randomised into intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio using the Random Sequence Generator (Prachanukool et al., 2022). |
||||||||
|
是否公开试验完成后的统计结果: Calculated Results after the Study Completed public access: |
公开/Public |
|
盲法: |
Due to the nature of the intervention, the participants cannot be blinded to the group allocation. The outcome assessors will be blinded to the group allocation. |
|
Blinding: |
Due to the nature of the intervention, the participants cannot be blinded to the group allocation. The outcome assessors will be blinded to the group allocation. |
|
试验完成后的统计结果(上传文件): |
|
|
Calculated Results after
|
|
|
是否共享原始数据: IPD sharing |
否No |
|
共享原始数据的方式(说明:请填入公开原始数据日期和方式,如采用网络平台,需填该网络平台名称和网址): |
None |
|
The way of sharing IPD”(include metadata and protocol, If use web-based public database, please provide the url): |
None |
|
数据采集和管理(说明:数据采集和管理由两部分组成,一为病例记录表(Case Record Form, CRF),二为电子采集和管理系统(Electronic Data Capture, EDC),如ResMan即为一种基于互联网的EDC: |
The principal investigator will identify potential participants through screening patient’s eligibility. She will then approach the eligible patient to explain the purpose and nature of the study and to obtain written consent. Patients will receive phone calls for follow-up assessment at week four post-allocation. The research assistants who are responsible for the follow-up assessment do not have knowledge to the group assignment, nor they do not have access to the randomization arrangement and the baseline data (Ouchi et al. 2025). |
|
Data collection and Management (A standard data collection and management system include a CRF and an electronic data capture: |
The principal investigator will identify potential participants through screening patient’s eligibility. She will then approach the eligible patient to explain the purpose and nature of the study and to obtain written consent. Patients will receive phone calls for follow-up assessment at week four post-allocation. The research assistants who are responsible for the follow-up assessment do not have knowledge to the group assignment, nor they do not have access to the randomization arrangement and the baseline data (Ouchi et al. 2025). |
|
数据与安全监察委员会: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: |
有/Yes |